Psychic Who Predicted JFK’s Assassination and 9/11 Also Made Chilling Prediction About Life In 2025

Jeane Dixon emerged as one of the most renowned psychics in America after she accurately predicted the events of 9/11 three decades prior. She also foresaw the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and made a chilling forecast regarding the year 2025. Born in the United States, Dixon was a psychic and astrologer who lived from 1904 to 1997, gaining fame for her accurate predictions. Her forecast concerning JFK’s assassination stated, ‘Regarding the 1960 election, Mrs. Dixon believes it will be influenced by labor and won by a Democrat. However, he will either be assassinated or die while in office.’ Dixon did not overlook the year 2025 in her predictions; like other psychics such as Baba Vanga and Nostradamus, she anticipated it would not be a particularly favorable year. This prediction was documented in her 1969 publication, My Life And Prophecies. Dixon’s forecast was politically charged, predicting that China would embark on a quest for global dominance, engaging in conflict with Russia from 2025 to 2037. She stated, ‘In the year 2025, Red China will achieve sufficient economic and political stability to advance and become the Great Conqueror.’ She elaborated, ‘In that year, Red China will invade Russia, seizing a significant portion of the USSR’s northern territory, and will continue until it reaches Finland, Norway, Sweden, and Denmark, halting at the German border.’ Furthermore, Dixon elaborated on the implications of her predictions.In summary, the Supreme Court ruling issued on April 16 determined that transgender women holding gender recognition certificates may be excluded from same-sex facilities if deemed ‘proportionate,’ according to CNN. The case was initially brought to the Supreme Court by the campaign group For Women Scotland (FWS) in 2018, which contended that the women’s rights outlined in the Equality Act should be applicable only to individuals assigned female at birth. Additionally, FWS questioned the definition of a woman and whether individuals with a gender recognition certificate identifying as women should be recognized as such. The court ultimately ruled that the terms ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ within the Equality Act pertain specifically to biological women and biological sex. Justices Lord Hodge, Lady Rose, and Lady Simler stated, ‘If a service provider is legally obligated to extend services previously reserved for women to trans women with a GRC, even if they present as biological men, it becomes challenging to justify denying those same services to biological men who also appear as biological men.’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *